千方级电解槽的返厂大修:隔膜更换与长周期衰减的技术账Overhaul of Thousand-Unit Electrolyzers Returning to Factory: Membrane Replacement and Long-Cycle Degradation Technical Account

一份维修采购公告,把绿氢装备的可靠性账第一次摆到了公开市场上。2026年10月29日,中国石化建设工程电子招标投标交易平台发布《新疆绿氢公司1#制氢厂房故障电解槽维修(一标段)采购公告》,维修范围为新疆库车绿氢示范项目1#制氢厂房两台单台1000Nm³/h的故障电解槽,标段合同估算金额236.42万元含税。主要工作内容列得很具体:电解槽拆卸、回装及往返运输;密封垫片、隔膜全套更换;双极板、碟簧性能评估及维护更换;电解槽拆解、组装、出厂检验及性能测试。一张维修清单里同时出现隔膜、密封垫片、双极板、碟簧四类部件,这不像单点失效,更像电解槽核心组件的成组老化被一次性摊到台面上。
维修范围里的技术信号:四类部件意味着什么
先看最核心的隔膜。碱性电解槽的隔膜承担两项互相冲突的职责:既要传导离子以维持电流,又要阻断氢氧两侧的气体混合。它的性能平衡决定了整槽的电耗与安全边界——隔膜性能不足不仅拉高电耗,还会引发氢氧串气带来安全隐患。更麻烦的是,隔膜的退化路径不止一条:强碱性电解液在高温高压下对极板、密封件、管路等部件腐蚀严重,水源与电解液中的杂质离子容易在电极和隔膜表面沉积结垢,造成催化层中毒与隔膜堵塞,最终表现为槽压持续升高、电耗不断增加。
密封垫片与隔膜在同一份清单里被要求全套更换,说明二者大概率是同批次、同服役周期到达寿命终点。电解槽的密封设计要同时承受碱液腐蚀、温度循环与压力波动,垫片老化后气密性下降,泄漏的碱雾会污染干燥系统、堵塞管路、影响仪表读数。这类失效有个特点:它不会立刻停机,而是以效率缓慢退化的方式表现出来,直到某个读数越过报警阈值才被发现。
双极板与碟簧被写成性能评估及维护更换,而不是直接更换,这个措辞值得注意。碟簧承担的是压紧力,接触电阻直接决定槽压;双极板的平面度与镀层状态同样影响接触电阻与流道分布。这两者的失效模式不是简单的断裂或锈蚀,而是性能漂移,因此才需要评估而非直接更换。一份维修清单同时覆盖这四类部件,反映出国内万吨级项目开始进入需要按周期做核心件大修的运行阶段。
验收测试事故:点火发生在受控排放环节意味着什么
同一时期另一个案例的启示方向完全相反。据Clean Power Hydrogen plc于2026年10月19日发布的MFE220测试事故调查进展公告,其1兆瓦无膜电解槽在2026年5月28日工厂验收测试第三阶段暨最终阶段发生系统点火故障,设备遭受严重损坏。公告列出的调查初步结论有四点:阀门V705附近的气体流速与颗粒冲击,可能在标准的受控排放过程中产生了足以引发点火的能量;部分止回阀、软管与管道弯头的规格与配置存在偏差;供应商质量以及露天测试设施的环境特点对装置整体所需的洁净度造成了影响,导致机组内部出现颗粒物污染;这项新型技术设计与欧洲工业气体协会相关指导规范的适用性与遵循程度正在作为补救设计流程的一部分予以评估。公告明确指出尚未确定单一的确定性点火源,且未发现任何证据表明事故起源于其专有的无膜电堆或配套分离器容器。
这四点并列的技术逻辑,比一个单点结论更值得研究。事故发生在“受控排放”环节而不是正常运行环节,这个位置本身就说明问题所在——受控排放是被当作安全程序设计的常规动作,恰恰在这个动作里系统需要把设备内部的气体安全排出。如果点燃发生在正常运行阶段,问题多半出在电化学或主流程上;发生在排放环节,说明触发条件来自管路末端的流动细节与颗粒物的随机撞击。颗粒物污染之所以能成为一项独立因素,是因为它同时具备两个性质:一是无处不在,供应商来料、装配过程、露天存放的测试场地都会引入;二是能量释放取决于撞击速度,气体流速越高颗粒撞击携带的动能越大。
颗粒物落到氢气作业环境里还有一个放大机制:颗粒表面往往携带金属氧化物,而金属氧化物正是氢气氧化的有效催化剂。这意味着一个原本需要较高活化能的缓慢氧化过程,会因为颗粒催化而显著加速。所以工程上对气体系统洁净度的要求,本质上是在管理一个非气相的反应动力学问题。公开信息未披露该事故的具体点火能量与试验气体成分,因此其机理链条只能依据公告所列因素做定性还原,尚无法逐项核验。
衰减率的三种口径:一个数字为什么不能直接比
把衰减这件事放到台面上,行业的混乱程度就显出来了。2026年11月6日东方电气2000Nm³/h碱性电解水制氢装备下线时公开表述,长周期运行能耗衰减小于1.5%每年;同一时期工信部规范条件征求意见稿给出的是另一套口径:碱性电解槽累计产氢运行2000小时后,额定电流密度下直流电耗增加值应不高于2%,其中后1000小时的增加值应不高于0.8%。两者的分母完全不同,一个是按年折算的长期漂移率,一个是按小时计的累计增量。
把这个尺度换算一下就会发现问题的实质。按每年8760小时计,1.5%每年的时间尺度远长于2000小时的试验窗口;而规范条件里后1000小时不超过0.8%的要求,折算到年化量级要显得严格得多。换句话说,厂商公布的年化衰减数字与规范条件的小时级考核值,根本不在同一把尺子上,不能直接比较谁更优。这正是当前行业最普遍的一类失真:把不同测量窗口、不同统计基准的数字并列,得出一个没有物理意义的优劣结论。
规范条件里那两段式的写法倒是体现了对衰减规律的理解。2000小时总增量不高于2%、其中后1000小时不高于0.8%,意味着前期允许的增量是1.2%、后期是0.8%,这种前松后紧的斜率指向典型的“衰减形态”——早期存在一次性不可逆损失,运行一段时间后进入相对平缓阶段。行业如果只用单一均值来描述衰减,就会把这个关键的形态信息抹掉,而衰减形态恰恰决定了检修窗口该怎么排、备件该怎么备。
从建到修:万吨级项目的运维账开始显形
库车绿氢示范项目在这条时间线上提供了一个坐标。据2026年11月5日发布的《中国氢能和绿色燃料试点典型案例(2026)》,新疆中石化库车绿氢示范项目自2023年投产以来,截至2026年9月已安全稳定运行超1100天;该项目建成30万千瓦光伏电站及2万吨/年电解水制氢厂,采用电解槽与气液分离四对一、与纯化装置八对一的集成模式,有效降低系统复杂度与投资,并打造全流程数字化平台实现生产优化与精细管理。这个集成模式的价值在于,它把多台电解槽与一套气液分离、一套纯化装置固定配比,减少了系统内的接口数量与调节维度。
但这套集成模式有一个隐含前提:接口数量减少意味着系统更稳定,可一旦某台槽需要大修,配比关系就要被打破。这也解释了为什么维修公告里专门列出拆卸、回装及往返运输与出厂检验及性能测试这几项——大修不是换一台槽那么简单,而是要拆解、评估、重装、再验证的一整套流程。两台槽的维修估算金额236.42万元,相对项目近30亿元的总投资与2万吨年的产能规模不算大,但它标志着国产万吨级绿氢项目正式从建设期转入运维期,而这笔后市场开支此前并没有出现在任何成本测算表里。
公开信息同时显示,库车项目电解槽由派瑞氢能、隆基氢能和苏州考克利尔竞立三家制氢厂商供货,本次启动维修的两台机组来自竞立。公告中对承包商资格的要求很能说明问题:2022年以来须有电解槽制造或维修或维保项目业绩,单项合同中单台制氢能力不低于800Nm³/h;项目经理与技术负责人须具备机电工程专业二级注册建造师或机械工程中级专业技术职称,并具备同等规模的项目执业业绩。这意味着大修能力已经变成一项有明确资质门槛的稀缺服务,而不只是设备厂商的售后服务。
研判:装备竞争的重心正在从下线仪式转向寿命终点
把这几件素材合在一起,可以给出一个明确的技术判断。绿氢装备的技术瓶颈已经从能不能造出来,转向能不能在长周期、高负荷、真实工况下稳定跑完寿命终点。这个转折有三层证据支撑:头部厂商已经能在发布会现场由第三方核验多负荷点的实际运行性能,说明制造能力与一致性控制已进入可检验阶段;万吨级项目开始按周期做核心件大修,说明衰减与老化的运维需求已经真实发生;而两起不同类型的事故与故障,则分别暴露了验收测试环节与长期运行环节的具体失效路径。
改进方向也随之清晰。第一是衰减率口径的统一,需要把测量窗口、统计基准、是否包含辅机能耗这三件事写进检测规范,否则跨厂商比较无从谈起。第二是失效机理的建库,工业和信息化部规范条件征求意见稿要求企业建立水电解制氢装备产品故障分析、可靠性评估与持续改进机制,提升产品运行稳定性与全生命周期质量水平,这一条切中了要害——把每一次换膜、每一次拆检的现场数据变成可累积的工程知识,比任何单次性能提升都更有长期价值。第三是验收测试的洁净度管理,CPH2的调查已经把颗粒污染、露天测试设施、供应商质量三条因素并列出来,教训不限于那一家企业。
中国产业发展促进会副会长兼氢能分会主任委员魏锁在2026年11月6日的公开表述中指出,氢能产业链主要技术、关键材料和器件及装备制造基本实现国产化,氢能产业已进入技术创新、示范应用、规模降本、市场开拓阶段,并提到要加强产业链协同创新,提高制氢系统在波动工况下的效率、寿命和安全性,加强基础研究、中试验证和工程示范的衔接,使新技术经受住真实工况和长期运行检验。把这句判断与库车项目的1100天运行记录放在一起,结论就很清楚了:国产化解决的是供给问题,寿命与真实性检验解决的是信任问题,而信任问题是绿氢产品进入国际认证体系与长期购销协议的先决条件。至于2026年11月6日下线仪式公布的装备长周期运行能耗衰减小于1.5%每年这一厂商口径,其价值取决于未来能否用统一方法在不同批次、不同厂家的设备上复现——而这恰恰是接下来标准化与检测体系建设最需要回答的问题。
本文参考资料来源于中国石化建设工程电子招标投标交易平台公开发布的电解槽维修采购公告;工业和信息化部公开发布的氢能装备制造行业规范条件征求意见稿、Clean Power Hydrogen plc公开披露的调查进展公告;中国石化报、中国能源新闻网、中国电力报及行业专业平台公开报道。
A maintenance procurement announcement has for the first time brought the reliability accounts of green hydrogen equipment into the public market. On October 29, 2026, the Sinopec Construction Engineering Electronic Tendering and Bidding Transaction Platform released the "Procurement Announcement for the Repair of Faulty Electrolyzers at Hydrogen Plant No. 1 of Xinjiang Green Hydrogen Company (Section 1)," with the maintenance scope covering two faulty single-unit 1000Nm³/h electrolyzers at the Hydrogen Plant No. 1 of the Xinjiang Kuqa Green Hydrogen Demonstration Project. The estimated contract amount for the section is 2.3642 million yuan including tax. The main work items were listed in detail: disassembly and reassembly of electrolyzers and round-trip transportation; complete replacement of gaskets and diaphragms; performance evaluation and maintenance replacement of bipolar plates and Belleville springs; electrolyzer disassembly, assembly, factory inspection, and performance testing. In a single maintenance list, there were simultaneously four types of components: diaphragms, gaskets, bipolar plates, and Belleville springs. This does not look like a single-point failure, but rather resembles the grouped aging of core electrolyzer components being revealed all at once.
Technical signal in the maintenance scope: what do the four types of components imply?
Let's first look at the most critical component: the diaphragm. The diaphragm in an alkaline electrolyzer has to fulfill two conflicting responsibilities: it must conduct ions to maintain the current, while also preventing the mixing of hydrogen and oxygen on either side. The balance of its performance determines the cell's overall power consumption and safety margin—insufficient diaphragm performance not only increases power consumption but also poses safety risks due to hydrogen-oxygen crossover. What makes it more troublesome is that the diaphragm can degrade in multiple ways: under high temperature and high pressure, the highly alkaline electrolyte severely corrodes components like electrodes, seals, and pipelines. Impurity ions in the water source and electrolyte can easily deposit and form scale on electrode and diaphragm surfaces, leading to catalyst layer poisoning and diaphragm blockage, ultimately manifesting as continuously rising cell voltage and increasing power consumption.
The gasket and diaphragm are required to be fully replaced in the same list, indicating that they most likely belong to the same batch and have reached the end of their service life at the same time. The sealing design of the electrolytic cell must withstand alkali corrosion, temperature cycling, and pressure fluctuations simultaneously. After the gasket ages, its airtightness decreases, and the leaking alkaline mist can contaminate the drying system, clog pipelines, and affect instrument readings. This type of failure has a particular characteristic: it does not cause an immediate shutdown, but manifests as a gradual efficiency degradation until a certain reading crosses the alarm threshold and is noticed.
The bipolar plates and disc springs are listed for performance evaluation and maintenance replacement, rather than direct replacement, which is a wording worth noting. The disc springs bear the clamping force, and the contact resistance directly determines the cell voltage; the flatness and coating condition of the bipolar plates also affect contact resistance and flow channel distribution. The failure modes of these two components are not simply breakage or rust, but performance drift, which is why evaluation is required instead of direct replacement. A maintenance list covering all four types of components reflects that domestic 10,000-ton projects have begun to enter an operational stage where core components need major overhauls according to a cycle.
Acceptance Test Accident: What It Means When Ignition Occurs During Controlled Emission
The implications of another case during the same period were completely opposite. According to the progress announcement of the MFE220 test accident investigation released by Clean Power Hydrogen plc on October 19, 2026, its 1-megawatt membraneless electrolyzer experienced a system ignition failure during the third and final stage of the factory acceptance test on May 28, 2026, causing severe damage to the equipment. The preliminary conclusions listed in the announcement include four points: the gas flow rate and particle impact near valve V705 may have generated enough energy to trigger ignition during standard controlled emissions; some check valves, hoses, and pipe elbows had deviations in specifications and configuration; supplier quality and the environmental characteristics of the outdoor test facility affected the overall cleanliness required by the unit, resulting in particle contamination inside the unit; and the applicability and compliance of this new technology design with the relevant guidance standards of the European Industrial Gases Association are being assessed as part of the remedial design process.
The announcement clearly pointed out that no single definitive ignition source has been determined, and no evidence was found to suggest that the incident originated from its proprietary membrane-free stack or supporting separator container.
The technical reasoning presented in these four points, considered together, is more worthy of study than a single-point conclusion. The incident occurred during the 'controlled venting' phase rather than during normal operation, and this location itself indicates where the problem lies—the controlled venting is a routine action designed as a safety procedure, precisely in this action the system needs to safely release the gas inside the equipment. If ignition had occurred during normal operation, the issue would most likely be related to the electrochemical process or the main system; occurring during the venting phase indicates that the triggering conditions come from the flow details and the random impact of particles at the end of the piping. Particulate contamination can be considered an independent factor because it has two characteristics: first, it is ubiquitous, being introduced through supplier materials, assembly processes, and open-air test sites; second, the energy release depends on the impact speed—the higher the gas flow velocity, the greater the kinetic energy carried by particle impacts.
There is another amplification mechanism when particulate matter falls into a hydrogen work environment: the surfaces of particles often carry metal oxides, and metal oxides are effective catalysts for hydrogen oxidation. This means that a slow oxidation process that originally requires a relatively high activation energy can be significantly accelerated due to particle catalysis. Therefore, the engineering requirements for gas system cleanliness are essentially about managing a non-gaseous reaction kinetics problem. Public information did not disclose the specific ignition energy and the composition of the test gas in this accident, so the mechanistic chain can only be qualitatively reconstructed based on the factors listed in the announcement, and cannot yet be verified item by item.
Three definitions of decay rate: Why a single number cannot be directly compared
Putting the issue of degradation on the table, the level of chaos in the industry becomes apparent. On November 6, 2026, when Dongfang Electric's 2000 Nm³/h alkaline water electrolysis hydrogen production equipment was launched, it publicly stated that the long-term operational energy consumption degradation was less than 1.5% per year; during the same period, the MIIT draft for normative conditions provided a different standard: after 2000 hours of cumulative hydrogen production by an alkaline electrolyzer, the increase in DC power consumption at the rated current density should not exceed 2%, with the increase during the latter 1000 hours not exceeding 0.8%. The denominators of the two standards are entirely different: one is the long-term drift rate calculated per year, and the other is the cumulative increment measured in hours.
Converting this scale reveals the essence of the problem. Calculated over 8,760 hours per year, a 1.5% per year timescale is far longer than the 2,000-hour test window; and the requirement in standard conditions that the last 1,000 hours should not exceed 0.8%, when converted to an annualized scale, appears much stricter. In other words, the annualized degradation figures published by manufacturers and the hour-level evaluation values under standard conditions are not measured on the same scale and cannot be directly compared to determine which is better. This is precisely the most common type of distortion in the industry today: placing numbers from different measurement windows and statistical bases side by side, leading to a conclusion of superiority or inferiority that has no physical meaning.
The two-stage writing in the specification conditions reflects an understanding of the attenuation pattern. A total increase of no more than 2% over 2000 hours, with no more than 0.8% in the last 1000 hours, means that the allowable increase in the early stage is 1.2% and in the later stage is 0.8%. This slope of loosening in the beginning and tightening later points to a typical 'attenuation pattern'—there is a one-time irreversible loss in the early stage, and after running for a while, it enters a relatively flat phase. If the industry only uses a single average to describe attenuation, this critical pattern information will be lost, and the attenuation pattern precisely determines how to schedule maintenance windows and prepare spare parts. From construction to maintenance: the operational and maintenance accounts of ten-thousand-ton-level projects start to become visible.
The Kuqa Green Hydrogen Demonstration Project provides a reference point on this timeline. According to the "Typical Cases of Hydrogen Energy and Green Fuel Pilots in China (2026)" released on November 5, 2026, since the Kuqa Green Hydrogen Demonstration Project by Sinopec Xinjiang began operation in 2023, it has been operating safely and stably for over 1,100 days as of September 2026. The project has built a 300,000-kilowatt photovoltaic power station and a 20,000-ton-per-year water electrolysis hydrogen plant, adopting an integration model with four electrolyzers to one gas-liquid separator and eight electrolyzers to one purification unit, effectively reducing system complexity and investment, and creating a full-process digital platform to achieve production optimization and precise management. The value of this integration model lies in fixing the ratio of multiple electrolyzers to one gas-liquid separator and one purification unit, reducing the number of interfaces and adjustment dimensions within the system.
But this integrated model has an implicit premise: a reduced number of interfaces means a more stable system. However, once a slot requires major maintenance, the proportional relationships must be disrupted. This also explains why the maintenance notice specifically lists disassembly, reassembly, transportation to and from, as well as factory inspection and performance testing—major maintenance is not as simple as replacing a single slot; it involves a whole process of disassembly, evaluation, reassembly, and revalidation. The estimated cost for repairing two slots is 2.3642 million yuan, which is not large compared to the project's total investment of nearly 3 billion yuan and an annual production capacity of 20,000 tons, but it marks the official transition of domestic ten-thousand-ton green hydrogen projects from the construction phase to the operation and maintenance phase, and this aftermarket expenditure had not previously appeared in any cost calculations.
Public information also shows that the electrolyzer for the Kuqa project is supplied by three hydrogen production companies—Pire Hydrogen, Longi Hydrogen, and Suzhou Cokelier—competing for the contract. The two units undergoing maintenance this time come from Cokelier. The requirements for contractor qualifications specified in the announcement are quite revealing: Since 2022, the contractor must have experience in electrolyzer manufacturing, maintenance, or servicing projects, and the hydrogen production capacity of a single unit in any single contract must not be less than 800 Nm³/h; the project manager and technical leader must have a second-level registered constructor qualification in electromechanical engineering or an intermediate professional technical title in mechanical engineering, and possess project experience on a similar scale. This means that major overhaul capability has become a scarce service with clear qualification thresholds, rather than merely an after-sales service provided by equipment manufacturers.
Assessment: The focus of equipment competition is shifting from the commissioning ceremony to the end of service life.
Combining these pieces of information can provide a clear technical assessment. The technical bottleneck of green hydrogen equipment has shifted from whether it can be built to whether it can reliably complete its lifespan under long cycles, high loads, and real operating conditions. This shift is supported by three layers of evidence: leading manufacturers can already have the actual operating performance at multiple load points verified by third parties at press events, indicating that manufacturing capability and consistency control have reached a verifiable stage; 10,000-ton projects have begun performing major overhauls of core components on a cyclical basis, showing that the operational demands due to degradation and aging are already occurring; and two different types of accidents and failures have respectively exposed the specific failure paths during acceptance testing and long-term operation.
The directions for improvement have also become clear. The first is the standardization of decay rate metrics, which requires including the measurement window, statistical baseline, and whether auxiliary energy consumption is accounted for in the testing specifications; otherwise, comparisons across manufacturers are meaningless. The second is the creation of a failure mechanism database. The draft guidelines for comments from the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology require companies to establish mechanisms for fault analysis, reliability assessment, and continuous improvement of water electrolysis hydrogen production equipment, in order to enhance operational stability and lifecycle quality. This point hits the core—turning every membrane replacement and disassembly inspection into accumulative engineering knowledge has more long-term value than any single performance improvement. The third is cleanliness management in acceptance testing. CPH2’s investigation has already listed particle contamination, open-air testing facilities, and supplier quality as three factors side by side, and the lessons are not limited to just one company.
Wei Suo, Vice President of the China Industrial Development Promotion Association and Chairman of the Hydrogen Energy Branch, stated publicly on November 6, 2026, that the main technologies, key materials, devices, and equipment manufacturing in the hydrogen energy industry chain have basically been localized. The hydrogen energy industry has entered the stages of technological innovation, demonstration applications, large-scale cost reduction, and market expansion. He also mentioned the need to strengthen collaborative innovation across the industry chain, improve the efficiency, lifespan, and safety of hydrogen production systems under fluctuating conditions, and enhance the integration of basic research, pilot testing, and engineering demonstrations so that new technologies can withstand real operating conditions and long-term operation inspections. Placing this assessment alongside the 1,100-day operational record of the Kuqa project makes the conclusion clear: localization solves the supply issue, while lifespan and real-world testing address the trust issue, and the trust issue is the prerequisite for green hydrogen products to enter international certification systems and long-term purchase and sales agreements.
As for the manufacturer's claim announced at the offline ceremony on November 6, 2026, that the long-cycle operational energy consumption of the equipment decays by less than 1.5% per year, its value depends on whether it can be replicated in the future using a unified method across equipment from different batches and manufacturers — and this is precisely the question that the upcoming standardization and testing system construction most needs to address.
The references for this article come from public announcements on the Sinopec Construction Engineering Electronic Bidding and Tendering Trading Platform regarding electrolyzer maintenance procurement; the draft for soliciting opinions on the specifications and conditions of the hydrogen equipment manufacturing industry publicly released by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology; investigation progress announcements publicly disclosed by Clean Power Hydrogen plc; and public reports from China Petrochemical News, China Energy News Network, China Power News, and industry-specific platforms.
本网站摘录或转载的属于第三方的信息,目的在于传递更多信息,内容仅供参考。相关股票、投融资等资讯及分析并不代表本网站赞同其意见和对其真实性负责,不构成投资建议。
若不慎涉及侵权,请在相关内容刊发之日起 30 日内联系我们,我们将第一时间进行删除处理。
转载本网资讯请注明来源作者。本网原创文章、研究报告禁止转发。
Information excerpted or reprinted from third parties on this website is intended to convey more information for reference only. Related stocks, investment and financing news and analysis do not represent the endorsement of this website, nor does this website assume responsibility for their authenticity, and do not constitute investment advice.
If any content unintentionally infringes upon rights, please contact us within 30 days from the date of publication, and we will remove it as soon as possible.
When reprinting content from this website, please indicate the source and author. Original articles and research reports of this website may not be redistributed.
数据来源与口径说明:本平台数据与资讯均以「唯一官方口径」采集与发布,优先采用国家部委、国家统计局、海关总署、中国氢能联盟、IEA / IRENA / IMO 等官方或政府间机构公开数据;同一指标只取一个来源,不做多源拼接。数值为公开发布值,可能因统计口径、产地与发布时间不同而存在差异,仅供参考,不构成交易依据。Data sources and methodology: all data and news on this platform are collected and published from a single official source, giving priority to public data from government bodies and intergovernmental organisations such as the National Bureau of Statistics, the General Administration of Customs, the China Hydrogen Alliance, and IEA / IRENA / IMO. One indicator has one source only and is never stitched together from multiple sources. Figures are published values and may vary with statistical scope, origin and release date. For reference only; not a basis for transactions.
相关信息Related Information同栏目 · 可直接进入各自最终页Same section · each opens its own final page
- 甘肃酒泉长时风光氢储一体化示范项目启动EPC招标绿氢与氢基燃料
- 9月最后一周530MW氢能招中标释放信号:绿氢项目从“单点示范”走向“集群放量”绿氢与氢基燃料
- 【中标】泰安宁阳1.77亿!江西建工二建中标生物质热电扩建2026-09-20
- 梨树风光制绿氢生物质耦合绿色甲醇项目制氢装置EPC建安调试标段中标公示绿氢与氢基燃料
- 49.2亿元!吉林梨树绿色甲醇项目制氢装置EPC中标候选人公示2026-05-15
- 兰州新区10万吨/年生物质绿色甲醇项目(一期)EPC工程总承包二标段(三次)中标结果公告2026-03-29