中国能源研究会品牌分会 指导Guided by ICC China
公 告NOTICE更多 ›More ›
首页Home>资讯详情Item Detail>氢焰在透平里稳住:纯氢燃机的微混燃烧与回火边界

氢焰在透平里稳住:纯氢燃机的微混燃烧与回火边界Hydrogen flame stabilized in turbines: Micro-mixed combustion and flashback boundaries of pure hydrogen engines

资讯详情Item Detail绿氢与氢基燃料 | 2026-11-07
信息来源:Source:中国能源产业发展网China Energy Industry Development Network
氢焰在透平里稳住:纯氢燃机的微混燃烧与回火边界

卓启焱

燃机点火的那一刻,控制室里盯着的往往不是功率,而是燃烧室里火焰的位置。天然气烧起来慢一些,火焰可以稳稳浮在喷嘴前方;换成氢气之后,火焰传播速度高出数倍,稍不留神就贴回喷嘴端面,金属在高温里迅速烧蚀。纯氢燃机的全部难题,都可以从这个"火焰站不住脚"的瞬间讲起。

近期的一纸名单把这条技术路线推到了台前。国家能源局发布2026年第5号公告,公布第六批能源领域首台(套)重大技术装备名单,明阳集团控股子公司无锡明阳氢燃动力科技有限公司自主研制的30MW级纯氢燃气轮机成功入选。此前,该机型核心技术攻关项目已入选2026年度江苏省科技重大专项。

政策侧的口径也在同步收紧。国家能源局、工业和信息化部、国务院国资委、市场监管总局联合印发《关于促进燃气轮机创新发展的指导意见》,明确提出加快绿色氢氨醇燃料在燃气轮机领域的技术攻关与试点应用,重点突破高比例氢燃料稳定燃烧等关键技术,推动多元燃料从掺烧向纯烧发展;到2030年建成自主可控的"研发—制造—验证—维护"全产业链体系,并鼓励自主燃气轮机申报能源领域首台(套)重大技术装备。

掺氢到纯氢,不是把燃料比例调高这么简单。氢气的体积热值低,同样功率下燃料体积流量大幅上升,燃料系统、阀门、流量测量的口径都要重新设计;氢气分子小,极易泄漏,密封结构与材料相容性成为安全底线;燃烧侧的火焰速度快,回火与火焰吹熄的边界被压缩,燃烧器的设计窗口变得非常窄;而火焰温度高,热力型氮氧化物的抑制难度也随之上升。

微混燃烧方案正是从燃烧组织上找解。把燃料与空气分成许多细小的射流,在极小的尺度上快速混合、快速反应,让火焰变成一串分布均匀的小火焰,而不是一团集中的高温区。这样做的效果有两层:单点火焰尺度小了,局部高温区被削平,氮氧化物生成受到抑制;混气速度高于火焰传播速度,回火通道被切断,燃烧室在宽负荷范围内更稳。在此基础上发展出的微预混低排放燃烧技术,进一步在部分负荷下维持了燃烧稳定性。

技术积累的厚度由公开数据支撑。据企业公开信息,明阳氢燃已获得发明专利授权21项、发表核心期刊论文9篇,并与清华大学、南京航空航天大学、北京航空航天大学、哈尔滨工程大学等高校开展联合技术攻关,持续推进透平叶片、智能控制及自主设计软件等关键技术研发。燃烧室之外,透平叶片的高温合金与冷却结构、控制系统的燃料切换逻辑,同样是纯氢燃机能否长周期运行的变量。

工程验证已经不只停在台架上。由明阳集团联合深圳能源共同打造的全球首台30MW级纯氢燃气轮机氢储能示范项目,落地于内蒙古鄂托克旗棋盘井工业园区,是深圳能源505MW风光制氢合成绿氨项目的配套工程。项目深度融合风电、光伏、电解水制氢系统,构建"绿电制绿氢、绿氢再发电"的"电—氢—电"能源转化模式,并入选国家首批能源领域氢能试点项目。

这类项目的价值在于把两种资源串起来。风光出力存在明显的时段性,制氢装置在电力富余时满负荷运行,在电力紧张时降低负荷;纯氢燃机则扮演"把氢气变回电"的出口,为长周期储能提供了一个可调度的末端。相比电池,氢储能的时间尺度更长、能量密度更高,代价是往返效率偏低,因此它更适合承担季节性调节与尖峰补位,而不是日内的频繁充放。

从产业链角度看,纯氢燃机的国产化程度决定项目成本。燃烧室、透平叶片、控制系统、燃料供给模块,每一环都有卡点;高温合金、热障涂层、精密铸造这些基础能力的成熟度,直接决定了整机的可靠性与检修周期。首台(套)名单的意义正在于此——用工程订单把验证链条拉通,让供应商有动力把工艺参数调到位。

燃料供给这一侧的改动常被低估。氢气的体积能量密度低,同样功率下需要更大的流量,管路通径、阀门口径、流量计选型都要按氢气重新计算;氢气分子小、渗透性强,法兰、螺纹、焊缝都可能成为泄漏点,密封材料要与氢气相容,连接处要有可检测的措施;储运环节的压力等级与安全距离,也决定了电站的总平面能不能布置得下。

燃烧稳定性是工程验证中最费时间的一项。预混燃烧在氢含量升高后容易出现热声振荡,表现为压力脉动,轻则影响排放,重则损伤燃烧室结构。解决方法通常是在燃烧器结构、燃料分级、空气分配上做组合调整,并配合主动控制手段抑制振荡。这些参数没有通用解,只能针对每一型燃烧室逐点试验,积累出一张覆盖负荷与环境温度的工作图。

氮氧化物的控制路径也需要重新设计。氢气燃烧的火焰温度高,热力型氮氧化物生成快,稀释燃烧、注水注汽、分级燃烧都是可选手段,但每一种都会带来效率与结构的补偿代价。在部分负荷工况下,如何同时守住排放限值与燃烧稳定性,是纯氢燃机与掺氢改造都要面对的两难。

与燃料电池、氢内燃机相比,纯氢燃机的定位在功率等级与持续时间。燃料电池适合分布式与高效率场景,氢内燃机改造门槛低但效率与排放不占优势,重型与中型燃机则能提供百兆瓦级、可长周期连续运行的调节能力。在新型电力系统里,这三类技术各有位置,谁也不会完全取代谁。

经济性最终取决于绿氢的价格与利用小时数。示范阶段的机组以验证技术为主,商业模式尚未闭环;等到绿氢成本随电解槽与绿电价格下行,纯氢燃机的机会才会在“长时储能+尖峰发电”的场景里真正打开。在那之前,掺氢改造是更现实的过渡路径。

接下来要回答的问题很具体:整机在燃料切换过程中能否稳定过渡,长周期运行后的燃烧室热部件寿命与设计值相差多少,氮氧化物排放在部分负荷下能否守住限值,运维体系能否支撑一座氢储能电站的日常检修。这些答案写在运行日志里,而不在鉴定证书上。

(来源:中国能源网、国家能源局、明阳集团官网、深圳能源)

【研究支持机构:《中国工业报社》能源与双碳研究中心 |中国能源产业发展网】

Zhuo Qiyan

At the moment of gas turbine ignition, what people in the control room often focus on is not the power, but the position of the flame in the combustion chamber. Natural gas burns a bit slower, allowing the flame to hover steadily in front of the nozzle; when switched to hydrogen, however, the flame propagation speed is several times higher, and if one is not careful, it can stick back to the nozzle face, causing the metal to erode rapidly under high temperatures. All the challenges of pure hydrogen turbines can be traced back to this moment when the "flame cannot hold its ground."

A recent list has brought this technical route to the forefront. The National Energy Administration released Notice No. 5 of 2026, announcing the sixth batch of major first-of-their-kind technical equipment in the energy sector. Mingyang Group’s holding subsidiary, Wuxi Mingyang Hydrogen Power Technology Co., Ltd., independently developed a 30MW-class pure hydrogen gas turbine, which was successfully selected. Previously, the core technology research project for this model had already been included in the 2026 Jiangsu Province Major Science and Technology Project.

The policy side is also tightening in sync. The National Energy Administration, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission, and the State Administration for Market Regulation jointly issued the "Guiding Opinions on Promoting the Innovative Development of Gas Turbines," clearly proposing to accelerate technological breakthroughs and pilot applications of green hydrogen, ammonia, and methanol fuels in the field of gas turbines, with a focus on overcoming key technologies such as stable combustion of high-proportion hydrogen fuels and promoting the development of multiple fuels from co-firing to pure firing. By 2030, a fully independent and controllable 'research—manufacturing—verification—maintenance' full industrial chain system is to be established, and independent gas turbines are encouraged to apply for the first major technical equipment in the energy field.

From hydrogen co-firing to pure hydrogen, it is not simply a matter of increasing the fuel proportion. Hydrogen has a low volumetric heating value, so under the same power, the volumetric flow rate of fuel rises significantly, requiring a complete redesign of the fuel system, valves, and flow measurement caliber. Hydrogen molecules are small and prone to leakage, making the compatibility of sealing structures and materials a fundamental safety concern. On the combustion side, flame speed is fast, reducing the margin to flashback and flame blowout, making the design window for burners extremely narrow. Furthermore, with high flame temperatures, the difficulty of suppressing thermal nitrogen oxides also increases.

The partially premixed combustion scheme seeks solutions from the organization of combustion. It divides the fuel and air into many fine jets, mixes and reacts quickly on a very small scale, turning the flame into a series of uniformly distributed small flames rather than a concentrated high-temperature zone. This approach has two effects: the single-point flame scale is reduced, local high-temperature zones are flattened, and nitrogen oxide formation is suppressed; the mixing speed is higher than the flame propagation speed, cutting off the flashback path and making the combustion chamber more stable over a wide load range. Based on this, the developed partially premixed low-emission combustion technology further maintains combustion stability under partial load.

The depth of technological accumulation is supported by publicly available data. According to the information disclosed by the company, Mingyang Hydrogen Fuel has obtained 21 invention patent authorizations, published 9 papers in core journals, and has carried out joint technological research with Tsinghua University, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beihang University, Harbin Engineering University, and other universities, continuously advancing research and development of key technologies such as turbine blades, intelligent control, and independently developed software. Beyond the combustion chamber, the high-temperature alloys and cooling structures of the turbine blades, as well as the fuel-switching logic of the control system, are also variables determining whether pure hydrogen gas turbines can operate for long cycles.

Engineering verification has gone beyond just the test bench. The world’s first 30MW-class pure hydrogen gas turbine hydrogen storage demonstration project, jointly developed by Mingyang Group and Shenzhen Energy, is located in the Qipan Jing Industrial Park in Otog Banner, Inner Mongolia, and serves as a supporting project for Shenzhen Energy's 505MW wind and solar electrolytic hydrogen to green ammonia project. The project deeply integrates wind power, photovoltaics, and water electrolysis hydrogen production systems, constructing an "electricity—hydrogen—electricity" energy conversion model of 'green electricity producing green hydrogen, and green hydrogen generating electricity again,' and has been included in the first batch of national hydrogen energy pilot projects in the energy sector.

The value of such projects lies in linking two types of resources. Wind and solar power output have obvious time variability; hydrogen production units operate at full capacity when electricity is abundant and reduce load when electricity is tight. Pure hydrogen gas turbines act as an outlet to "turn hydrogen back into electricity," providing a dispatchable endpoint for long-term energy storage. Compared to batteries, hydrogen storage operates on a longer time scale and has higher energy density, with the trade-off being lower round-trip efficiency. Therefore, it is more suitable for seasonal regulation and peak shaving rather than frequent daily charge and discharge.

From an industry chain perspective, the degree of domestic production of pure hydrogen gas turbines determines project costs. Combustion chambers, turbine blades, control systems, and fuel supply modules each have critical points; the maturity of basic capabilities such as high-temperature alloys, thermal barrier coatings, and precision casting directly determines the reliability and maintenance cycle of the whole machine. The significance of the first unit/order list lies in this—it uses engineering orders to connect the verification chain, giving suppliers the incentive to adjust process parameters properly.

Changes on the fuel supply side are often underestimated. Hydrogen has a low volumetric energy density, requiring a higher flow rate for the same power output, which means pipes, valve sizes, and flow meter selections must all be recalculated for hydrogen; hydrogen molecules are small and highly permeable, making flanges, threads, and welds potential leak points, and sealing materials must be compatible with hydrogen, with detectable measures at connection points; the pressure levels and safety distances in storage and transportation also determine whether the overall layout of the power station can be accommodated.

Combustion stability is the most time-consuming aspect in engineering verification. Premixed combustion tends to exhibit thermoacoustic oscillations as the hydrogen content increases, manifesting as pressure fluctuations that can, at a minimum, affect emissions and, at worst, damage the combustion chamber structure. The usual solution involves a combination of adjustments to burner structure, fuel staging, and air distribution, complemented by active control measures to suppress oscillations. These parameters do not have a universal solution and must be tested point by point for each type of combustion chamber to build an operating map covering load and ambient temperature conditions.

The control path for nitrogen oxides also needs to be redesigned. The flame temperature of hydrogen combustion is high, and thermally generated nitrogen oxides form quickly. Measures such as diluted combustion, water or steam injection, and staged combustion are all options, but each comes with a trade-off in efficiency and structural cost. Under partial load conditions, how to simultaneously maintain emission limits and combustion stability is a dilemma that both pure hydrogen turbines and hydrogen-blended retrofits must face.

Compared with fuel cells and hydrogen internal combustion engines, pure hydrogen turbines are positioned in terms of power level and duration. Fuel cells are suitable for distributed and high-efficiency scenarios, hydrogen internal combustion engine retrofits have a low threshold but do not excel in efficiency or emissions, while heavy and medium turbines can provide adjustment capabilities at the hundred-megawatt level for long continuous operation. In the new type of power system, these three technologies each have their place, and none will completely replace the others.

The economic viability ultimately depends on the price of green hydrogen and the number of operating hours. Units in the demonstration phase are mainly aimed at validating the technology, and the business model has not yet been closed; only when the cost of green hydrogen declines along with the prices of electrolyzers and green electricity will the opportunities for pure hydrogen gas turbines truly open up in scenarios of 'long-duration storage and peak power generation.' Until then, hydrogen blending retrofits are a more realistic transitional path.

The next questions to answer are very specific: Can the whole unit transition smoothly during fuel switching? How much will the service life of the combustion chamber’s hot components differ from the design value after long-term operation? Can nitrogen oxide emissions stay within limits under partial load? Can the operation and maintenance system support the daily maintenance of a hydrogen energy storage power plant? These answers are written in operational logs, not on certification documents.

(Source: China Energy Network, National Energy Administration, Mingyang Global Group official website, Shenzhen Energy)

[Research Support Organization: Energy and Dual-Carbon Research Center, China Industrial Newspaper | China Energy Industry Development Network]

版权声明Copyright Notice

本网站摘录或转载的属于第三方的信息,目的在于传递更多信息,内容仅供参考。相关股票、投融资等资讯及分析并不代表本网站赞同其意见和对其真实性负责,不构成投资建议。

若不慎涉及侵权,请在相关内容刊发之日起 30 日内联系我们,我们将第一时间进行删除处理。

转载本网资讯请注明来源作者。本网原创文章、研究报告禁止转发。

Information excerpted or reprinted from third parties on this website is intended to convey more information for reference only. Related stocks, investment and financing news and analysis do not represent the endorsement of this website, nor does this website assume responsibility for their authenticity, and do not constitute investment advice.

If any content unintentionally infringes upon rights, please contact us within 30 days from the date of publication, and we will remove it as soon as possible.

When reprinting content from this website, please indicate the source and author. Original articles and research reports of this website may not be redistributed.

联系电话 / Tel010-85763416邮箱 / EmailEmail / Emaillsrlcyl_2026@163.com
提交留言留下联系方式,平台将把您的需求推送给匹配的产业方Leave your contact details and we will match you with relevant industry partners.
数据来源与免责声明Data Sources & Disclaimer

数据来源与口径说明:本平台数据与资讯均以「唯一官方口径」采集与发布,优先采用国家部委、国家统计局、海关总署、中国氢能联盟、IEA / IRENA / IMO 等官方或政府间机构公开数据;同一指标只取一个来源,不做多源拼接。数值为公开发布值,可能因统计口径、产地与发布时间不同而存在差异,仅供参考,不构成交易依据。Data sources and methodology: all data and news on this platform are collected and published from a single official source, giving priority to public data from government bodies and intergovernmental organisations such as the National Bureau of Statistics, the General Administration of Customs, the China Hydrogen Alliance, and IEA / IRENA / IMO. One indicator has one source only and is never stitched together from multiple sources. Figures are published values and may vary with statistical scope, origin and release date. For reference only; not a basis for transactions.

AI
智能客服Smart Assistant绿色燃料国际商务网 · 在线服务Green Fuel International Business Network · Online Service
×
人工服务:工作日 09:00—18:00 | 联系电话 010-85763416Human service: Weekdays 09:00—18:00 | Tel 010-85763416
智能客服Smart Assistant