氢能的主战场在窑炉:佛山的氨氢燃烧与产业链配套The Main Battlefield of Hydrogen Energy is in Furnaces: Ammonia-Hydrogen Combustion and Industrial Chain Support in Foshan

明慧
氢能城市的竞争,表面看是政策和补贴的竞争,往深处看是产业结构的竞争。谁的传统产业最需要脱碳,谁就最有动力把氢能从示范场景推进到生产线上。佛山的答案是窑炉——那里烧的是天然气,也是这座城市最大的一块碳排放。
41座加氢站,200多家氢能企业及机构,氢能专利占全国12%。这三个数字都属于佛山,且都是地级市里的第一。氢能这条赛道,佛山已经跑了十八年。
佛山发展氢能的底子,不是资源,是工业。这座城市拥有规上工业企业1.1万家,装备制造、泛家居两个万亿级产业集群。氢能需要的压缩机、阀门、压力容器、金属加工、控制系统,在佛山的产业目录里都能找到配套。这是它与其他氢能城市最大的不同——别处是先有氢再有产业,佛山是先有产业再长出氢。
按佛山市发改局公开的口径,全市集聚氢能企业及机构超过200家,是国内少数同时拥有燃料电池8大核心零部件和整车生产能力的城市;建成加氢站41座,数量全国第一;氢能专利占全国12%,稳居地级市首位。核心承载区南海,集聚企业和机构超过170家,占广东全省约三分之一。
燃料电池的八大核心零部件,包括电堆、膜电极、双极板、质子交换膜、催化剂、气体扩散层、空压机、氢气循环泵。能把这八样凑齐,意味着产业链不是组装厂,而是有材料、有部件、有系统的完整生态。这在国内城市里是稀缺能力。
十八年这个时间跨度,最能说明佛山的路径。南海区连续9年将氢能写入区政府工作报告,从一个示范项目起步,到建设“中国氢能产业之都”,靠的是长期主义。新兴产业最缺的不是政策,而是耐心;佛山把耐心写进了年度政府工作报告。
场景是佛山最强的一张牌。氢能有轨电车、氢能公交、氢能物流车、氢能渣土车、氢能两轮车,这座城市把能试的场景几乎试了一遍。南海的加氢站规划给出了清晰的需求测算:2025至2026年建设30座加氢站,2027至2028年全面实现油氢合建站捆绑运营、全区共计92座,到2030年基本建成176座,保障2600辆公务车、2100辆物流车和渣土车、近2000辆公交车以及4万辆两轮车的加氢需求。
这份规划的思路值得其他城市借鉴。站的数量不是拍脑袋定的,而是按车辆保有量倒推;站的形态不是一律新建,而是油氢合建、复用土地;站的建设不是一次性铺开,而是分三档推进。加氢网络是重资产,节奏比规模更重要。
真正让佛山区别于其他氢能城市的,是“氨氢融合”。仙湖实验室程一兵院士团队牵头攻关,全球首条陶瓷工业氨氢零碳燃烧量产线已在蒙娜丽莎投产,并实现数月稳定运行。这个项目的意义不在实验室,而在佛山的支柱产业——陶瓷。
陶瓷是典型的高温工业,窑炉要靠天然气烧到上千摄氏度。用氨和氢替代天然气,等于把整个行业的碳排放路径换掉。佛山有庞大的陶瓷产能,一旦技术跑通并具备经济性,减排的体量远大于交通领域。这也是佛山把氢能从交通延伸到工业的原因:它的产业结构决定了氢的主战场在窑炉,不在轿车。
出海是2026年的新动作。5月18日至19日,2026国际氢能发展论坛在香港举行,佛山市委常委、常务副市长刘杰在开幕式作主题演讲,论坛次日专门设置“氢能产业地方实践研讨会”佛山分会场,佛山几十家氢能企业、机构集体亮相。香港环境及生态局副局长黄淑娴在会上表示,佛山是中国氢能之都,产业布局走在全国前列,是香港重要的合作伙伴。
这场论坛的分量,不只是一次亮相。“佛山智造—香港出海—全球市场”的路径在会场被反复提及。香港有国际资本、国际标准、国际通道,佛山有制造能力和完整链条,两者结合,指向的是氢能装备的出口。对一家佛山的储氢瓶或加氢机企业而言,香港是跳板,不是终点。
佛山对自身的判断也很清醒。市发改局大湾区办主任王慧艳在论坛上用三个“看”定调:看大势,氢能已从“未来选项”变为“必争之地”;看佛山,全力打造“中国氢能产业之都”;看未来,港佛同心,携手共赴新赛道。她还援引国际能源研究机构报告指出,2026年全球氢能将迎来重要转折点,谁能率先打通应用场景、实现商业闭环,从“讲故事”转向“算成本”,谁就能抢占先机。
“算成本”这三个字,正是佛山氢能下一阶段的考题。41座加氢站的背后是运营压力,200多家企业的背后是订单竞争,专利占全国12%的背后是技术转化率。示范期靠政府买单,商业化期要靠市场买单,这个转换不会自动完成。
氢价是第一个观察窗口。全国范围内,加氢站的终端氢价正在从每公斤30元以上向25元靠拢,佛山所在的广东走在前列,广州2026年已降至25.9元/公斤。氢价每下降1元,重卡的全生命周期成本就下移一截,商业闭环的可能性就多一分。
第二个窗口是装备出海。全球氢能项目正在从示范走向规模化,电解槽、储氢瓶、加氢站设备的采购量在上升。佛山的装备制造能力,配上香港的国际通道,有机会把“卖设备”做成“卖标准”。这比在国内打价格战更有价值。
第三个窗口是工业替代。陶瓷窑炉的氨氢燃烧如果能在更多产线复制,佛山的氢能需求结构会发生根本变化——从交通的小批量、多点位,转向工业的大批量、单点集中。这会重构整个加氢与储运网络的经济性。
佛山的故事说明,氢能城市的竞争,最终不是政策力度的竞争,而是产业结构的竞争。谁的传统产业最需要脱碳,谁就最有动力把氢能做成真生意。佛山的陶瓷、铝型材、家具,都是高温高耗能的行业,这既是减排压力,也是氢能的市场。
十八年,41座站,200多家企业。佛山没有把氢能做成一个概念,而是做成了一个产业生态。接下来的十八年,考验的是这个生态能不能自己造血。
佛山的氢能产业链,还有一个容易被忽略的优势:装备出口的通道。全市氢能企业及机构超过200家,覆盖制氢、储运、加注、电堆、系统、整车,意味着海外客户可以在一个城市完成整条链的采购。这种“一站式”能力,是国内多数氢能城市不具备的。
挑战也摆在明面上。41座加氢站的运营成本、200多家企业的订单竞争、专利优势的转化效率,都需要在商业化阶段接受检验。佛山给出的答案是继续往工业端走——陶瓷窑炉的氨氢燃烧一旦规模化,氢的需求结构会从分散的交通加注,转向集中的工业供能,整条链的经济性都会被重估。
【文中信息及数据来源于:佛山市发展和改革局2026年5月20日公开报道、佛山市政府门户网站关于南海区加氢站规划与氢能产业的公开信息、2026国际氢能发展论坛公开信息、广州日报2026年4月17日报道】
【研究支持机构:《中国工业报社》能源与双碳研究中心 |中国能源产业发展网】
本文参考数据来源:广州日报、佛山市发展和改革局、佛山市政府门户网站、2026国际氢能发展论坛
Minghui
The competition for a hydrogen energy city, on the surface, is a competition of policies and subsidies; at a deeper level, it is a competition of industrial structure. Whose traditional industries most need decarbonization, who then has the most motivation to advance hydrogen from demonstration scenarios to production lines. Foshan's answer is kilns—there, natural gas is burned, and it is also the city's largest source of carbon emissions.
41 hydrogen refueling stations, over 200 hydrogen enterprises and institutions, hydrogen energy patents accounting for 12% nationwide. All these three figures belong to Foshan, and all are first among prefecture-level cities. On the hydrogen energy track, Foshan has been running for eighteen years.
Foshan's foundation for developing hydrogen energy is not resources, but industry. This city has 11,000 industrial enterprises above designated size, with trillion-level industrial clusters in equipment manufacturing and general home furnishings. The compressors, valves, pressure vessels, metal processing, and control systems needed for hydrogen energy can all be found in Foshan's industrial catalog. This is its biggest difference from other hydrogen cities—elsewhere, hydrogen comes first, then the industry; in Foshan, industry comes first, then hydrogen grows.
According to the data released by the Foshan Development and Reform Bureau, the city has more than 200 hydrogen energy enterprises and institutions, making it one of the few cities in China that simultaneously possesses the ability to produce all eight core components of fuel cells as well as complete vehicles. The city has built 41 hydrogen refueling stations, the highest number in the country. Hydrogen energy patents account for 12% nationwide, maintaining the top position among prefecture-level cities. The core hub is Nanhai, which hosts more than 170 enterprises and institutions, accounting for about one-third of the total in Guangdong province.
The eight core components of fuel cells include fuel cell stacks, membrane electrodes, bipolar plates, proton exchange membranes, catalysts, gas diffusion layers, air compressors, and hydrogen circulation pumps. Being able to assemble all eight indicates that the industry chain is not just an assembly plant but a complete ecosystem with materials, components, and systems. This capability is rare in Chinese cities.
The 18-year timespan best illustrates Foshan's pathway. For nine consecutive years, Nanhai District has included hydrogen energy in its government work reports, starting from a demonstration project and advancing to become the "China Hydrogen Energy Industry Capital," relying on long-term planning. What emerging industries lack most is not policy but patience; Foshan has incorporated patience into its annual government work reports.
The scenario is Foshan's strongest card. Hydrogen energy trams, hydrogen energy buses, hydrogen energy logistics vehicles, hydrogen energy construction waste vehicles, hydrogen energy two-wheelers—this city has almost tried every possible use case. The hydrogen refueling station plan in Nanhai provides a clear demand estimate: 30 stations will be built from 2025 to 2026; from 2027 to 2028, full-scale co-location of oil and hydrogen stations will be implemented, with a total of 92 stations throughout the district; by 2030, 176 stations will be basically completed, ensuring hydrogen refueling needs for 2,600 official cars, 2,100 logistics and construction waste vehicles, nearly 2,000 buses, and 40,000 two-wheelers.
The thinking behind this plan is worth other cities learning from. The number of stations is not decided arbitrarily; it is derived based on the vehicle fleet size. The station types are not all newly built; they include co-located oil and hydrogen stations and reuse of land. The construction of stations is not rolled out all at once; it is advanced in three phases. A hydrogen refueling network is a capital-intensive asset, and the pace of development is more important than scale.
What truly distinguishes Foshan from other hydrogen cities is the 'ammonia-hydrogen integration.' Led by Academician Cheng Yibing's team from Xianhu Laboratory, the world's first zero-carbon ammonia-hydrogen combustion production line for the ceramic industry has been put into operation at Mona Lisa, achieving several months of stable operation. The significance of this project lies not in the laboratory, but in Foshan's pillar industry — ceramics.
Ceramics is a typical high-temperature industry, with kilns requiring natural gas to reach temperatures of over a thousand degrees Celsius. Replacing natural gas with ammonia and hydrogen effectively changes the entire industry's carbon emission pathway. Foshan has a massive ceramic production capacity, and once the technology is proven and economically viable, the volume of emissions reduction will far exceed that in the transportation sector. This also explains why Foshan extends hydrogen energy from transportation to industry: its industrial structure determines that the main battlefield for hydrogen is in kilns, not cars.
Going overseas is a new initiative in 2026. From May 18 to 19, the 2026 International Hydrogen Energy Development Forum was held in Hong Kong. Liu Jie, member of the Standing Committee of the Foshan Municipal Committee and Executive Vice Mayor, delivered a keynote speech at the opening ceremony. On the following day, the forum set up a special 'Local Practices in the Hydrogen Energy Industry Seminar' Foshan session, where dozens of hydrogen energy enterprises and institutions from Foshan made a collective appearance. At the meeting, Wong Shuk-han, Deputy Secretary for Environment and Ecology of Hong Kong, stated that Foshan is China’s hydrogen capital, with industrial layout leading the nation, and is an important cooperation partner for Hong Kong.
The significance of this forum is more than just a showcase. The path of 'Foshan Intelligent Manufacturing—Hong Kong Going Overseas—Global Market' was repeatedly mentioned at the venue. Hong Kong has international capital, international standards, and international channels, while Foshan has manufacturing capabilities and a complete industrial chain. The combination of the two points towards the export of hydrogen energy equipment. For a Foshan-based enterprise producing hydrogen storage cylinders or hydrogen refueling machines, Hong Kong is a springboard, not the end point.
Foshan has a very clear judgment of itself. Wang Huiyan, Director of the Greater Bay Area Office of the Municipal Development and Reform Bureau, set the tone at the forum with three perspectives: looking at the trend, hydrogen energy has shifted from a 'future option' to a 'contested territory'; looking at Foshan, fully committed to building the 'Hydrogen Energy Industry Capital of China'; looking at the future, Hong Kong and Foshan united, joining hands to advance in the new track. She also cited a report from an international energy research institute pointing out that 2026 will be a critical turning point for global hydrogen energy, and whoever can first open application scenarios and achieve a commercial closed loop, shifting from 'telling stories' to 'calculating costs,' will seize the opportunity.
The three words 'calculating costs' are precisely the next phase challenge for Foshan's hydrogen energy. Behind 41 hydrogen refueling stations is operational pressure; behind more than 200 companies is competition for orders; behind holding 12% of national patents is the technology conversion rate. The demonstration phase relies on government funding, while the commercialization phase must rely on the market, and this transition will not happen automatically.
The first observation window is hydrogen pricing. Nationwide, the terminal hydrogen price at refueling stations is moving from above 30 yuan per kilogram toward 25 yuan, with Guangdong, where Foshan is located, leading the way; Guangzhou has already dropped to 25.9 yuan/kg in 2026. Every 1 yuan decrease in hydrogen price lowers the full lifecycle cost of heavy trucks, increasing the possibility of a commercial closed loop.
The second window is equipment going overseas. Global hydrogen projects are moving from demonstration to scale, and the procurement of electrolyzers, hydrogen storage tanks, and refueling station equipment is increasing. Foshan's equipment manufacturing capability, combined with Hong Kong's international channels, has the opportunity to turn 'selling equipment' into 'selling standards.' This is more valuable than engaging in price wars domestically.
The third window is industrial substitution. If ammonia-hydrogen combustion in ceramic kilns can be replicated across more production lines, the structure of Foshan's hydrogen demand will fundamentally change—from small-batch, multi-point traffic usage to large-batch, centralized industrial usage. This would restructure the economics of the entire hydrogen refueling and storage-transport network.
The story of Foshan shows that the competition among hydrogen energy cities ultimately is not about policy strength, but about industrial structure. Whoever's traditional industries most need decarbonization will have the greatest motivation to turn hydrogen energy into a real business. Foshan's ceramics, aluminum profiles, and furniture industries are all high-temperature and high-energy-consuming sectors, which not only creates pressure for emissions reduction but also represents a market for hydrogen energy.
Eighteen years, 41 stations, more than 200 enterprises. Foshan has not treated hydrogen energy as just a concept, but has developed it into an industrial ecosystem. The next eighteen years will test whether this ecosystem can sustain itself.
Foshan's hydrogen energy industrial chain has another often overlooked advantage: a channel for equipment exports. The city has more than 200 hydrogen energy enterprises and institutions, covering hydrogen production, storage and transportation, refueling, fuel cells, systems, and vehicles, which means that overseas customers can complete the procurement of the entire chain in one city. This 'one-stop' capability is something that most other hydrogen energy cities in China do not have.
The challenges are also laid out openly. The operating costs of 41 hydrogen refueling stations, the order competition among more than 200 companies, and the efficiency of converting patent advantages all need to be tested during the commercialization stage. Foshan's answer is to continue moving toward the industrial end—once ammonia-hydrogen combustion in ceramic kilns is scaled up, the demand structure for hydrogen will shift from decentralized vehicle refueling to centralized industrial energy supply, and the economics of the entire chain will be reassessed.
[Information and data in the text come from: Public reports by the Foshan Development and Reform Bureau on May 20, 2026; public information on Nanhai District hydrogen station planning and the hydrogen energy industry from the Foshan government portal; information from the 2026 International Hydrogen Energy Development Forum; Guangzhou Daily report on April 17, 2026]
[Research support institutions: Energy and Dual-Carbon Research Center, China Industrial Newspaper | China Energy Industry Development Network]
Data sources referenced in this article: Guangzhou Daily, Foshan Development and Reform Bureau, Foshan government portal, 2026 International Hydrogen Energy Development Forum
本网站摘录或转载的属于第三方的信息,目的在于传递更多信息,内容仅供参考。相关股票、投融资等资讯及分析并不代表本网站赞同其意见和对其真实性负责,不构成投资建议。
若不慎涉及侵权,请在相关内容刊发之日起 30 日内联系我们,我们将第一时间进行删除处理。
转载本网资讯请注明来源作者。本网原创文章、研究报告禁止转发。
Information excerpted or reprinted from third parties on this website is intended to convey more information for reference only. Related stocks, investment and financing news and analysis do not represent the endorsement of this website, nor does this website assume responsibility for their authenticity, and do not constitute investment advice.
If any content unintentionally infringes upon rights, please contact us within 30 days from the date of publication, and we will remove it as soon as possible.
When reprinting content from this website, please indicate the source and author. Original articles and research reports of this website may not be redistributed.
数据来源与口径说明:本平台数据与资讯均以「唯一官方口径」采集与发布,优先采用国家部委、国家统计局、海关总署、中国氢能联盟、IEA / IRENA / IMO 等官方或政府间机构公开数据;同一指标只取一个来源,不做多源拼接。数值为公开发布值,可能因统计口径、产地与发布时间不同而存在差异,仅供参考,不构成交易依据。Data sources and methodology: all data and news on this platform are collected and published from a single official source, giving priority to public data from government bodies and intergovernmental organisations such as the National Bureau of Statistics, the General Administration of Customs, the China Hydrogen Alliance, and IEA / IRENA / IMO. One indicator has one source only and is never stitched together from multiple sources. Figures are published values and may vary with statistical scope, origin and release date. For reference only; not a basis for transactions.
相关信息Related Information同栏目 · 可直接进入各自最终页Same section · each opens its own final page
- 从"主配微"协同到算电协同:江西一张看不见的网托起看得见的灯火暖与产业旺2026-10-12
- 废枝变船燃料 香港中华煤气旗下VENEX入选全球可持续交通优秀实践案例绿色甲醇Green Methanol
- 海南首个万吨级“海风—绿氢—绿色甲醇”示范项目落子儋州洋浦绿色甲醇Green Methanol
- 中裕能源携旗下广东宝杰打通生物质能全链路生物质与生物燃料biomass and biofuel
- 山西落地全省首笔“生物质能循环利用”生物多样性贷款生物质与生物燃料biomass and biofuel
- 286亿元与17万吨绿色甲醇:辽源“绿氢+”项目进入投产前联动调试绿色甲醇Green Methanol