10亿元示范收官:金昌给氯碱化工装上“绿氢引擎”1 Billion Yuan Demonstration Concludes: Jinchang Installs a 'Green Hydrogen Engine' in Chlor-Alkali Chemical Industry

马行川
西北首个规模化“氯碱化工—绿氢—绿电”协同示范项目,在甘肃金昌进入建成投产阶段。据公开项目信息,该项目总投资约10亿元,计划于2026年10月全面建成投产,年减排二氧化碳超过8万吨。
氯碱是化工行业里的“电老虎”。电解食盐水生产烧碱、氯气和氢气的工艺,单位产品电耗高,电力成本往往占生产成本的六成以上。长期以来,氯碱企业用网电、烧蒸汽,生产过程中的氢气大多作为中间产物就地利用或放散,碳排放与能源成本同步高企。
金昌这个项目要做的,是把氯碱生产放进一个全新的能源体系里。绿电直供电解槽,替代部分网电;富余绿电用于电解水制氢,绿氢再回补到氯碱及下游产品生产中。电、氢、化工原料在生产链条内部循环,化石能源的痕迹被一点点挤出去。
“氢电耦合”的产业逻辑并不复杂:氯碱行业同时需要电和氢,而绿电和绿氢恰好可以互相转化、互为备份。光伏大发时,绿电直接驱动电解槽;用电低谷或电网调节需要时,电力制氢储存能量,氢又成为化工原料。对电网而言,这是一个可调节的柔性负荷;对企业而言,这是一套降碳又降本的能源方案。
金昌的先天条件与这套模式相当契合。地处河西走廊,风光资源富集,周边风电光伏基地密集;同时金昌是西北重要的氯碱化工基地,拥有镍钴等有色金属冶炼与化工产业基础。资源禀赋与产业基础的“双向奔赴”,让示范项目有了落地的土壤。
从行业尺度看,氯碱只是高耗能化工脱碳的一个缩影。合成氨、甲醇、炼化等行业同样面临“电力+氢气”双高耗的问题,绿电绿氢耦合的路径可以整体平移。国家层面多份政策文件均提出推动绿氢在化工领域的规模化应用,一批氢冶金、氢化工耦合项目正在内蒙古、宁夏、甘肃等地铺开。
示范项目的价值在于把模式跑通。10亿元的投资规模,在化工项目中并不算大,但它的意义在于验证了“绿电—绿氢—化工”闭环在真实生产环境中的可行性:装置能否稳定运行、成本能否压到可接受区间、减排数据能否兑现。这些答案,比投资额本身更有分量。
当氯碱行业的电解槽开始“喝”绿电、生产线开始“用”绿氢,传统高耗能产业与新型电力系统的连接,便不再只是概念。金昌这座戈壁城市,正用一座10亿元的示范项目,给化工脱碳写下注脚。
资料来源:中项网项目库公开信息、行业公开报道
氯碱行业的绿色转型,其实有两条并行的主线。一条是用能结构清洁化,即提高绿电在电力消费中的占比;另一条是氢气价值化,把电解食盐水副产的氢气和新增的绿氢从“副产品”变成“产品”。金昌示范项目把两条主线拧成一股绳:绿电驱动电解槽,绿氢进入化工生产,副产氢与绿氢协同利用,能量流与物质流在厂区内实现闭环。
从资源匹配度看,金昌具备发展绿氢化工耦合的现实基础。当地及周边风光资源丰富,河西走廊已建成多个大型风光基地,电力外送通道完善;同时,金昌依托镍钴资源形成了有色金属冶炼、氯碱化工等产业群,工业用电负荷大、用氢需求真实存在。资源侧与需求侧的距离短,意味着绿电绿氢的消纳成本更低。
政策层面的支持也在加码。国家发展改革委、国家能源局等部门近年多次发文,明确鼓励绿氢在化工、冶金等领域替代化石能源制氢,支持“绿电—绿氢—绿色化工”一体化项目建设。内蒙古、甘肃、宁夏等风光资源富集省份,均将氢能耦合化工列入重点产业方向。
当然,耦合模式的经济性仍需时间验证。绿氢成本目前仍高于灰氢,化工企业能否承受阶段性成本上升、碳交易收益能否部分对冲,是项目可持续运营的关键变量。行业测算普遍认为,随着电解槽价格下降与绿电成本走低,绿氢与灰氢的价差正在收窄,耦合项目的盈亏平衡点有望提前到来。
金昌项目的另一个价值,在于为同类园区提供可复制的工程经验。氯碱、合成氨、甲醇等化工行业的装置流程相近,用能结构相似,一套经过验证的“绿电直供+绿氢回补”方案,可以快速复制到其他高耗能化工园区。示范的意义,从来不止于示范本身。
当10亿元的投资换来一条可复制的脱碳路径,金昌这座戈壁工业城市的转型故事,便有了更强的说服力。氯碱行业装上“绿氢引擎”之后,传统化工与新型电力系统的连接将更加紧密,而更多高耗能行业的目光,也会投向河西走廊。
对于能源产业观察者而言,康保的真正看点,不在于单一项目的产能数字,而在于它展示了一条“资源地制氢—液氢储运—跨区域流通”的完整链路。链路的每一环都还有优化空间,但链条本身已经成型。中国绿氢产业的下一个里程碑,或许就从这样一座坝上工厂开始。
液态阳光项目的落地,还牵动着一批产业链企业的机会。电解槽供应商、催化剂厂商、二氧化碳捕集装备企业、风光EPC承包商,都在围绕乌审旗项目展开合作与竞争。10万吨级项目的采购与技术验证,为国内绿氢化工装备的国产化迭代提供了实战场景。
国际能源转型的大背景,也在为液态阳光背书。全球航运业减排规则收紧,欧盟碳边境调节机制覆盖范围扩大,绿色甲醇的国际贸易需求预期升温。中国拥有全球领先的风光制造与工程建设能力,若能在绿氢化工工艺上形成自主体系,绿色甲醇有望成为新的出口品类。
当然,任何新技术的产业化都伴随风险。绿氢成本的波动、甲醇市场价格的周期、碳交易机制的不确定性,都可能影响项目的投资回报。正因如此,中煤鄂能化的示范项目更显珍贵——它用真金白银为行业探索边界,无论成败,都将为后来者提供坐标。
对化工行业而言,绿氢的价值不仅是减碳,更是能源安全的延伸。绿电制氢摆脱了对化石能源制氢的依赖,原料来源更加多元可控;对地处西北、化石资源与风光资源兼备的地区来说,氢电耦合意味着把本地资源禀赋转化为产业竞争力。
【研究支持机构:《中国工业报社》能源与双碳研究中心 |中国能源产业发展网】
Machuan
The first large-scale 'chlor-alkali chemical–green hydrogen–green electricity' collaborative demonstration project in Northwest China has entered the stage of construction completion and production in Jinchang, Gansu. According to publicly available project information, the total investment of the project is about 1 billion yuan, and it is planned to be fully completed and operational by October 2026, with an annual reduction of more than 80,000 tons of carbon dioxide.
Chlor-alkali is the 'electricity guzzler' in the chemical industry. The process of producing caustic soda, chlorine, and hydrogen through the electrolysis of brine consumes a high amount of electricity per unit of product, often accounting for more than 60% of production costs. For a long time, chlor-alkali enterprises have used grid electricity and steam for production, and most of the hydrogen produced in the process has been used on-site as an intermediate product or vented, resulting in high carbon emissions and energy costs.
What the Jinchang project aims to do is to integrate chlor-alkali production into a completely renewable energy system. Green electricity is supplied directly to the electrolytic cells, replacing part of the grid electricity; surplus green electricity is used for water electrolysis to produce hydrogen, and green hydrogen is then fed back into chlor-alkali and downstream product production. Electricity, hydrogen, and chemical raw materials circulate within the production chain, gradually squeezing out the footprint of fossil energy.
The industrial logic of 'hydrogen-electric coupling' is not complicated: the chlor-alkali industry requires both electricity and hydrogen, while green electricity and green hydrogen can convert into each other and serve as backups for one another. When photovoltaic power is abundant, green electricity can directly drive electrolyzers; during periods of low electricity demand or when grid regulation is needed, electricity can be used to produce hydrogen for energy storage, and hydrogen then becomes a chemical feedstock. For the grid, this is an adjustable flexible load; for enterprises, it is an energy solution that reduces both carbon emissions and costs.
Jinchang's inherent conditions are highly compatible with this model. Located in the Hexi Corridor, it is rich in wind and solar resources, with dense nearby wind and photovoltaic bases; at the same time, Jinchang is an important chlor-alkali chemical hub in Northwest China, with a foundation in nickel, cobalt, and other nonferrous metal smelting and chemical industries. The 'mutual advancement' of resource endowment and industrial foundation provides fertile ground for the implementation of demonstration projects.
From an industry perspective, chlor-alkali is just a microcosm of the decarbonization of high-energy-consuming chemical industries. The industries of synthetic ammonia, methanol, and refining also face the dual high-consumption issue of 'electricity and hydrogen,' and the pathway of coupling green electricity and green hydrogen can be applied across the board. At the national level, multiple policy documents have proposed promoting the large-scale application of green hydrogen in the chemical industry, and a number of hydrogen metallurgy and hydrogen-chemical coupling projects are being launched in Inner Mongolia, Ningxia, Gansu, and other regions.
The value of demonstration projects lies in running the model successfully. An investment scale of one billion yuan is not particularly large for a chemical project, but its significance lies in verifying the feasibility of the 'green electricity–green hydrogen–chemical industry' closed loop in real production environments: whether the equipment can operate stably, whether costs can be brought down to an acceptable range, and whether emission reduction data can be realized. These answers carry more weight than the investment itself.
When the electrolyzers in the chlor-alkali industry begin to 'consume' green electricity and production lines start to 'use' green hydrogen, the connection between traditional high-energy industries and new power systems is no longer just a concept. The city of Jinchang, situated in the Gobi Desert, is using a one-billion-yuan demonstration project to provide a footnote for chemical industry decarbonization.
Source: Public information from the Zhongxiang Network project database and industry public reports.
The green transformation of the chlor-alkali industry actually follows two parallel main lines. One is the cleaning of the energy structure, that is, increasing the proportion of green electricity in power consumption; the other is the valorization of hydrogen, turning hydrogen produced as a by-product from electrolyzing brine and new green hydrogen from a "by-product" into a "product." The Jinchang demonstration project combines these two main lines: green electricity drives the electrolysis cells, green hydrogen enters chemical production, and by-product hydrogen is used in coordination with green hydrogen, achieving a closed loop of energy flow and material flow within the plant area.
From the perspective of resource matching, Jinchang has a practical foundation for developing green hydrogen-chemical coupling. The local and surrounding areas are rich in wind and solar resources, with several large wind-solar bases already built in the Hexi Corridor and well-established power transmission channels; meanwhile, Jinchang relies on nickel and cobalt resources to form industrial clusters such as non-ferrous metal smelting and chlor-alkali chemical production, with high industrial electricity loads and genuine hydrogen demand. The short distance between the resource side and the demand side means lower costs for absorbing green electricity and green hydrogen.
Support at the policy level is also increasing. In recent years, departments such as the National Development and Reform Commission and the National Energy Administration have issued multiple documents explicitly encouraging green hydrogen to replace fossil energy-based hydrogen in sectors like chemicals and metallurgy, and supporting the construction of integrated "green electricity—green hydrogen—green chemical" projects. Provinces rich in wind and solar resources, such as Inner Mongolia, Gansu, and Ningxia, have all included hydrogen-coupled chemical industries as key industrial directions.
Of course, the economic viability of the coupling model still needs to be tested over time. Currently, the cost of green hydrogen is still higher than gray hydrogen. Whether chemical enterprises can bear temporary cost increases and whether carbon trading revenues can partially offset them are key variables for the sustainable operation of projects. Industry estimates generally believe that, as the price of electrolyzers decreases and the cost of green electricity falls, the price gap between green hydrogen and gray hydrogen is narrowing, and the breakeven point for coupled projects is expected to arrive sooner.
Another value of the Jinchang project lies in providing replicable engineering experience for similar industrial parks. Processes in the chemical industries such as chlor-alkali, synthetic ammonia, and methanol are similar, and their energy structures are alike. A validated solution of 'direct green electricity supply with green hydrogen replenishment' can be quickly replicated in other high-energy-consuming chemical parks. The significance of demonstration has never been limited to the demonstration itself.
When a 1 billion yuan investment results in a replicable decarbonization pathway, the transformation story of Jinchang, this industrial city on the Gobi Desert, becomes more persuasive. After equipping the chlor-alkali industry with a 'green hydrogen engine,' the connection between traditional chemical industries and new power systems will become closer, and more high-energy-consuming industries will also direct their attention to the Hexi Corridor.
For energy industry observers, the real highlight of Kangbao is not the production figures of a single project, but that it demonstrates a complete chain of 'hydrogen production at the resource site—liquid hydrogen storage and transportation—cross-regional circulation.' Each link in this chain still has room for optimization, but the chain itself is already taking shape. The next milestone in China's green hydrogen industry may well begin with such a factory on the Bashang Plateau.
The implementation of the Liquid Sunshine Project also drives opportunities for a number of industrial chain enterprises. Suppliers of electrolyzers, catalyst manufacturers, carbon dioxide capture equipment companies, and wind-solar EPC contractors are all collaborating and competing around the Wushenqi project. The procurement and technical validation of a 100,000-ton-level project provide a real-world scenario for the localization and iteration of domestic green hydrogen chemical equipment.
The global energy transition also lends credibility to Liquid Sunshine. As global shipping emission reduction regulations tighten and the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism expands its coverage, the international demand for green methanol is expected to heat up. China possesses world-leading wind and solar manufacturing and engineering construction capabilities, and if it can establish an independent system in green hydrogen chemical processes, green methanol could become a new export category.
Of course, the industrialization of any new technology carries risks. Fluctuations in green hydrogen costs, the cyclical nature of methanol market prices, and uncertainties in carbon trading mechanisms could all affect project investment returns. For this reason, China Coal Enechem's demonstration project is especially valuable—it invests real money to explore the boundaries for the industry, and regardless of success or failure, it will provide a reference point for future ventures.
For the chemical industry, the value of green hydrogen is not only in carbon reduction but also an extension of energy security. Hydrogen production from green electricity breaks away from dependence on fossil fuels, and the sources of raw materials are more diverse and controllable; for regions in the northwest with both fossil resources and wind and solar resources, hydrogen-electricity coupling means transforming local resource endowments into industrial competitiveness.
[Research supporting institutions: Energy and Dual-Carbon Research Center, China Industrial Newspaper | China Energy Industry Development Network]
本网站摘录或转载的属于第三方的信息,目的在于传递更多信息,内容仅供参考。相关股票、投融资等资讯及分析并不代表本网站赞同其意见和对其真实性负责,不构成投资建议。
若不慎涉及侵权,请在相关内容刊发之日起 30 日内联系我们,我们将第一时间进行删除处理。
转载本网资讯请注明来源作者。本网原创文章、研究报告禁止转发。
Information excerpted or reprinted from third parties on this website is intended to convey more information for reference only. Related stocks, investment and financing news and analysis do not represent the endorsement of this website, nor does this website assume responsibility for their authenticity, and do not constitute investment advice.
If any content unintentionally infringes upon rights, please contact us within 30 days from the date of publication, and we will remove it as soon as possible.
When reprinting content from this website, please indicate the source and author. Original articles and research reports of this website may not be redistributed.
数据来源与口径说明:本平台数据与资讯均以「唯一官方口径」采集与发布,优先采用国家部委、国家统计局、海关总署、中国氢能联盟、IEA / IRENA / IMO 等官方或政府间机构公开数据;同一指标只取一个来源,不做多源拼接。数值为公开发布值,可能因统计口径、产地与发布时间不同而存在差异,仅供参考,不构成交易依据。Data sources and methodology: all data and news on this platform are collected and published from a single official source, giving priority to public data from government bodies and intergovernmental organisations such as the National Bureau of Statistics, the General Administration of Customs, the China Hydrogen Alliance, and IEA / IRENA / IMO. One indicator has one source only and is never stitched together from multiple sources. Figures are published values and may vary with statistical scope, origin and release date. For reference only; not a basis for transactions.
相关信息Related Information同栏目 · 可直接进入各自最终页Same section · each opens its own final page
- 从"主配微"协同到算电协同:江西一张看不见的网托起看得见的灯火暖与产业旺2026-10-12
- 废枝变船燃料 香港中华煤气旗下VENEX入选全球可持续交通优秀实践案例绿色甲醇Green Methanol
- 海南首个万吨级“海风—绿氢—绿色甲醇”示范项目落子儋州洋浦绿色甲醇Green Methanol
- 中裕能源携旗下广东宝杰打通生物质能全链路生物质与生物燃料biomass and biofuel
- 山西落地全省首笔“生物质能循环利用”生物多样性贷款生物质与生物燃料biomass and biofuel
- 286亿元与17万吨绿色甲醇:辽源“绿氢+”项目进入投产前联动调试绿色甲醇Green Methanol